Dear Sir/Ma'am,
Could you please suggest if cystoscopy required for below case? Any other suggestions please.
For Male, 72 years:
On medication: Tomsulosin 0.4 and Mira 25 mg
CT whole abdomen report: A well defined ovoid cystic structure seen at the bladder dome at the site of urachal insertion is consistent with a urachal remnant cyst.
No abnormal colonic wall thickening is seen to suggest colitis on this study. No diverticulitis is seen. Urinary bladder is well distended and shows diffuse wall thickening which could be due to cystitis or outlet obstruction.
USG whole abdomen report: • Urinary bladder diverticulum with dependent mobile calcific foci within, suggestive of diverticular calculi. • Mild urinary bladder wall thickening.
Thank you very much.
Regards.
Definitely Cystoscopy is required at the least. Contact an urologist as any diverticulum in urinary bladder causes urinary stasis and recurrent infections. It needs to be worked up and managed. You can contact me.
Answered2026-05-05 09:37:02
Let others know if this answer was helpful
Didn't find the answer you are looking for?
Talk to experienced doctor online and get your health questions answered in just 5 minutes.
Cystoscopy is advisable in this case.
Reasons: bladder wall thickening + diverticulum with stones + urachal cyst
Need direct visualization to rule out obstruction, chronic cystitis, or malignancy.
Dear sir mam
Due to addiction of prone masturbation i have lost my sexual strength
I havr very serious ED
...Read More
Disclaimer : The content is not intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified health provider with any questions you may have regarding your medical condition. Never disregard professional medical advice or delay in seeking it because of something you have read on this website.