Good question.. U must know one thing..when a doctor is positive for Hiv ,HBSAg or HCV positive, he is not licensed for practice further under regular conditions This protocol however is safe to patients even unchecked for doctors Because Doctors may get transmitted from patients but not vice versa because sterile conditions are followed  during touching,examination and procedures.Blood,body fluids are mostly not transimissable in 99.9% of procedures

That’s a very thoughtful question — and it’s understandable to feel it’s unfair that patients must be tested while doctors are not. (Though most corporate hospitals now have routine yearly checkups for doctors too) But this isn’t about unequal rules — it’s about how safety is ensured differently for patients and healthcare workers. Patients are tested before surgery mainly so the medical team can take specific precautions (for example, avoiding sharp exposure, proper disposal, post-exposure prophylaxis if needed) and to plan post-operative infection control so that the next patient doesn’t get infected. For doctors, the system works the other way — every surgeon and nurse is trained and legally required to follow “universal precautions”, meaning they must treat every single patient as potentially infectious, regardless of test results. Because these precautions (sterile gloves, masks, instruments, safe disposal, double gloving, etc.) are followed with every surgery, the patient’s safety does not depend on knowing the doctor’s HIV status. Also, under the HIV & AIDS (Prevention and Control) Act, 2017, a person’s HIV status — including that of doctors — is strictly confidential by law. Disclosure is only allowed if it directly affects patient safety, which in modern surgical practice, it does not.